On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:18:13 -0700, Hawke
wrote:

On 10/28/2012 4:10 AM, John B. wrote:

So one has a choice Bull **** or Bird ****?
Unfortunately chicken **** is a very poor fertilizer so the Bull ****
wins.

So you don't know much about growing plants, do you? If you did you
would know that chicken **** is far superior to cow manure if you want
to grow things. Should I hold it against you from now on that you said
that chicken **** is a very poor fertilizer when that is false? Are you
lying or do you just not know that chicken **** is a very good
fertilizer? Which ever it is from now on you better start providing
citations for everything you say. Your word can't be trusted.

Actually I do know. You see both my grand parents were commercial
chicken raisers and had literally tons of chicken manure to dispose
of.

But since you obviously don't know anything about the subject (you
could have looked it up) I'll explain. Chicken manure contains an
excess of nitrogen and shouldn't be used fresh. What one should do is
expose the manure to the open air for a period before spreading it.

In New England the technique was to spread the manure after the first
snow and let it weather all winter.

Any farmer knows that you don't use fresh manure of any kind.


Must be some of this "modern knowledge". When I was a lad it was
straight from the pile to the field if it was the issuance of horses
or cows. Chickens were a different story.


Now, Hawke. You didn't have to be so stupid. the information is all
around you, if you have a computer. You could have looked it up and
spoken as a wise man instead of talking "off the top of your head" and
demonstrating to the world that you really, really, don't know what
you are talking about.

Here's the thing. I made a living for several years growing plants. I
used chicken manure for fertilizer all the time. So I don't need to
Google things that I have personal experience doing. I don't need to
Google, how to catch a football. I know how. I don't Google chicken
fertilizer because I know how to use it in the field.


I see.... well I should have know. Hawke is a self glorifying expert
in ****.

But then, it took you 40 years to get an education so I suppose it is
going to take another forty before you learn that it is better to keep
one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and prove it.

I got a very good education long before I got my college degrees. I just
didn't have a formal education, and it did not take me forty years to
get my education. I have 20 years of formal education. I just did not
accumulate it all at one time. Keep trying to find fault with my
education. Maybe you will find something if you keep at it. But I doubt it.

20 years of formal education. My, my. 12 years of grade school and 8
years of collage. so obviously you have a doctorate. I can't imagine
why you haven't told us.

In fact, the simple fact that you have never bragged about your
doctorate is ample grounds to believe that you are lying abut your
education now.

(40 more years of Hawke, playing the fool)

You now are in second place for most pretentious boob here. Pimpleton
has you beat but you are near the top for thinking you know so much more
than you really do. I'd say it's because you are a typical white,
republican, American, male, but I'm not sure what you actually are other
than half of what you think you are.

Hawke
--
Cheers,
John B.