On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:01:52 -0000, ARW wrote:

Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:51:55 -0000, ARW
wrote:
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:02:11 -0000, ARW
wrote:
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:06:48 -0000, ARW
wrote:
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:03:59 -0000, tony sayer
wrote:
In article op.wmusaui2ytk5n5@i7-940, Lieutenant Scott
scribeth thus
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:25:15 +0100, John Williamson
om wrote:

Lieutenant Scott wrote:

I can not and will not tolerate safety.

Just remind us of your address, so we can mark the
house down as probably lethal should it come onto
the market.

If you want to be a sissy, by all means change the
house when you buy it.

Its nothing ay all about being a "sissy" due to your
disregard of safety -you- can endanger someone's else's
life and health.

Being afraid of dangerous things is being a sissy. That's
what the word means.

Have you been cleaning windows in Bath recently?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20105872

You do have to take risks in life - even crossing the road
is a calculated risk.

Well the bloke is still alive, so he's obviously good at
climbing. I wouldn't do that myself as I'm not that agile. But I
would if I had his abilities.
It is pathetic the way they call it an "incident". The
incident has not happened, he has not fallen.

Considering some of the dangerous and stupid things I have done
at work (and also when not at work) then I am probably not the
right person to give advice about H&S.

List them. Then explain why you are taking the opposite view.

That would be a long list.

List the most interesting ones.

Most regular posters have already read about them.

Post them again.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one -- George Bernard Shaw