Stupid pointless CFLs
wrote:
On Monday, October 15, 2012 9:00:10 AM UTC+1, Steve Firth wrote:
meow2222 wrote:
So you didnt use enough wattage, and theyre all bad because of that. I'm
totally convinced.
You need to learn to read dumbass.
no I don't
I said the room was adequately lit with 100W of incandescent tungsten
lighting (4x25).
The 14W CFLs, largest wattage available in that package, were supposed
to be "equivalent" to 40W tungsten. They weren't they were equivalent to
12W tungsten at best. The 3W LED is at least as bright as the 25W
tungsten. It's an excellent bulb and also uses less electricity than the
CFL, which is ****. In all cases there are four (4) bulbs.
Was that too fast for the custard made with **** that someone filled
your skull with?
Abuse doesn't make your puerile proposal any truer.
BTW, your line length is ****ed, your post is double spaced because you
are using the "new" Google groups which is reserved for trolls and
morons. Which one are you? Or in your case is it "both"?
Its obvious you can't provide a fact and logic based case
I just did you arsehole. It's clear that you can't read.
--
€˘DarWin|
_/ _/
|