On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:30:48 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote:

On Oct 10, 12:05*am, "
wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:48:53 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote:

On Oct 8, 5:53*pm, "
wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT), Pavel314 wrote:
On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:19:17 AM UTC-4, harry wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:24*am, "Stormin Mormon" wrote: As with every business, the only options include driving less, or rasing prices. 9mpg???!! Get a properly designed truck instead of American ****, Or even a diesel engined one. That's the sort of mileage you get from a truck that carries 16 tons in Europe.

I have a 2008 F-150 with a V-6 and automatic trans that gets around 14, but I rarely carry heavy loads.

My 2001 Ranger with a V-6 (4l) and automatic w/4WD gets around 15 on a good
day, in the summer (maybe 12 in a Vermont Winter - another reason to leave
NE). It's an exceedingly rare even that I carry a heavy load far enough to get
a handle on the gas mileage. *I've pulled a U-Haul several times but that's
not really the same thing.

Sounds more like a good reason to get rid of your Ranger.

I really didn't expect you to have any more economic sense than that.

Only Nancy boys drive automatics.

Or those with a knee problems.

There are European cars do 70 mpg

Irrelevant. * I wouldn't drive any of your ****boxes.

Limos do 40mpg these days.

Irrelevant.

You're living in the past in America.

Then be prepared to walk redneck.

harry, you're even dumber than the ordinary leftist. Amazing.