On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:24:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 10/4/2012 6:41 AM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:03:21 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 10/3/2012 9:46 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:02:16 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 10/3/2012 6:22 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:42:33 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

Watch the whole video?!

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=E3mzhvMgrLE&NR=1

I want to see the greedy mo fo jam his hand into the blade as proof of
safety. If you slipped on sawdust and your hand hit the table to stop
your face from going into the blade, it would be moving a wee bit
faster than he micrometered his pinky into that blade. Feh!


Kind of a sadistic ******* are you.

What's sadistic about a plain old real-world test, Leon?

I want to see the greedy mo fo jam his hand into the blade as proof of
safety.

You play stupid splendidly.

Au contraire, mon ami. If it's so safe, as he repeatedly says it is,
it won't harm him in the slightest. Would YOU jam your hand into the
spinning blade of a SawStop? I'm requesting real-world testing, not
this inch-a-pinky crap. NOBODY working on a saw moves that slowly.

I think only you would expect the SawStop to protect youself from
yourself. It FYI the SawStop would also not protect you from slamming
your head against the table top to see if it would raise a knot.

For you to continually deflect questions and come back with totally
off-the-wall scenarios is reason to suspect you of being a secret
liberal. You really want our government to take over and force all of
us to buy SawStops, don't you? sigh

--
Doctors prescribe medicine of which they know little,
to cure diseases of which they know less,
in human beings of which they know nothing.
--Francois-Marie Arouet Voltaire, about 250 years ago