Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Doctor Drivel wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Doctor Drivel wrote:
It's mainly because their fuel efficiency is, and always will be,
poor.
This idiot is at it gain. The fuel consumption is not poor when run
at a constant speed high revs at it "sweet spot".
It is still poor when compared to a piston engine designed to do the
same thing.

Senile person, not so. Also the superior light weight and very small
size and ultra reliability make this unit idea as range extender that
would not kick in much. But this logic is beyond senile people. Sad
but true.

A wankle ultra reliable? Anymore 'facts' you wish to invent?

You can rely on them not to last long. You can rely on them to break
easily. ;-)

--
Tciao for Now!

John.