On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:34:00 -0400, Jim Elbrecht
wrote:

NV had the 'none of the above' line-- but the R's had it removed from
the presidential line because they were afraid it might beat Mitt.

"...U.S. District Judge Robert Jones said the state’s decades-old
ballot alternative of “none of the above” was unconstitutional because
votes for “none” don’t count in the final tallies that determine
winners."

The "none of the above" was made an option after Watergate.

The same law allowed Harry Reid to be elected in one case, shame.
--