View Single Post
  #44   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
Larry Jaques[_4_] Larry Jaques[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,025
Default O/T: BLOG POST OF THE DAY

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:00:53 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:

On 08/21/2012 10:01 AM, Han wrote:
So that's where you can get a 370 fold (37,000%) yield?


It's entirely possible, legal, and ethical.


It's also possible for people to put their shares of their companies
into the IRA, which may be true in this case.


Romney has large amounts of capital off-shore. Theoretically that
money could be in use to support the US economy. Is it?

So what? It is HIS money and where he chooses to keep it is HIS
business.

Great job creators always look out for themselves first.


I'm not sure I know what that means. EVERYONE (who is sane) looks
out for themselves and the ones they love first. The virtue of
capitalism is that, in doing so, they incidentally create opportunity
for others.


All businesspeople who do well take care of themselves first. If
they're not solvent, they lose the business and their employees lose
their jobs. I hope Han tells us what he meant by that.


In other words, if this is legal, is it right?


Nothing you've suggested even rises slightly to any level of being
unethical.

That's your opinion. I disagree.



Please cite a single demonstrable example of something being unethical.
You cannot. You may not *like* what he's done, but it's HIS money
and therefore, no one else's business.


I'd like to see that, too. IAC, I won't be voting for the
Romneycritter.

--
And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud
was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
-- Anaïs Nin