On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:39:26 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:00:25 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:22:21 -0700, "David Kaye"
wrote:

The gun nuts claim to follow the Constitution, but the Constitution makes
VERY CLEAR that the laws are subject to interpretation by the Supreme Court,
and it is THEIR DECISION as to what a particular clause actually means.

Well, the Supreme Court has ruled many times that the 2nd Amendment refers
to regulating a MILITIA, and that it does not confer ANY right for
individual citizens to own guns.

Good Lord, you're stupid. I thought Dougie was bad!



I still am bad if that means I still favor better laws to account for
gun ownership.

No, you're not "bad". You're an idiot. You can't help it.

I don't want "anyone" to have a right to own a gun no
matter how well you word your reply.

If not just "anyone" has the right to own a gun, then there is *no* right to
own guns. There are those who have lost that right but that's a different
subject. You seem to be vary confused about what constitutes a "right". Not
unexpected because you are vary confused about EVERYTHING. Lefties are.

There has to be some regulation
(perhaps I should say better regulation) of gun ownership in a
civilized world.

What "regulation" would you like, moron?