On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 05:15:07 -0700 (PDT), gpsman
wrote:

On Aug 5, 2:11*pm, "
wrote:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:16:22 -0700 (PDT), gpsman
wrote:
On Aug 5, 12:23*pm, "

Driving doesn't,
indeed can't, require 100% concentration. You'd never get to work.

How would concentrating on driving prevent arrival at a
destination... ?

You really are an idiot. *If it took 100% concentration to drive, you couldn't
GET EVEN THAT FAR, moron.

That's merely repeating your assertion. *The question is "how".

You obviously can't read. *No one can give 100% concentration to *anything*
for long periods. *It's physically impossible.

Your cite seems to be missing...

You're an idiot. It's impossible for a human to concentrate on one thing for
even ten minutes. The brain doesn't function that way.

This includes those platooning at 77 in a 55 maintaining 1 car length
between themselves while intermittently changing lanes each time the
bumper of the forward vehicle in the next lane inches ahead of the
bumper to the front... until the inexplicable! braking wave brings
them all to screeching halts.

More strawmen. Set 'em up and knock 'em down. Nice technique.

There are no straw men in that paragraph. *A straw man is an
fallacious argument based on misrepresentation of an opponent's
position.

You have no brain. *The issue has nothing to do with *anything* in that
paragraph. *It is a total strawman.

No, you don't know what straw man means, even after I told you. *Not
only do you seem stupid but incapable of learning.

Wrong. A strawman argument can be a perfectly valid argument. *It doesn't
address the point, however. *It is specifically set up to win an argument,
even if it isn't the same argument.

Are you really another of Dumb****'s nyms? *You're about that smart.

Said the guy who wouldn't know a straw man if hit over the head with
it.

Good Lord, you're an idiot.

If the gross incompetence of ***the vast majority*** of motorists
escapes your detection you haven't even noticed how infrequently they
can be bothered to signal their turns and lane changes.

It is *not* the "vast majority" who are grossly incompetent. *If it were,
there would be *far* more accidents.

Non sequitur. *Not crashing is the least standard of competence.

It's the only one that matters.

There's a small matter of causing others to crash.

Are you *really* that stupid? A crash is a crash. If the problem were as bad
as you say, there would be crashes everywhere.

If they aren't grossly incompetent why won't the vast majority do such

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

a simple thing as signal...? *Too hard...?

Cite!

Consider yourself the winner of Least Observant Self-certified Usenet
Driving Expert, August 2012.

Consider yourself the stupidest person on the Usenet, August 2012. ...and
that's some honor.