DIYbanter - View Single Post

George Plimpton

On 7/31/2012 4:01 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:25:10 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:

On 7/31/2012 3:16 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:29:51 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:56:59 -0700, George Plimpton
wrote:

All of the places I said I would
consider are the least "southern" places in the south. The rest of the
south is permanently backward, but those places are different.

You mean filled with liberal Democrats, like Austin and Atlanta?

Sure, he want's to come down where it's cheap and people are left alone, then
demand all the liberal crap he has in the sewer he lives in now.

You see, you dumb fat ****?

I see what, you illiterate dumb****? Another leftist moron who needs to go
back to first grade. With a nym like Plumpton, you're calling me fat,
Georgie??

Do you see that even your fellow backward semi-literate knuckle-dragging
cracker admits that Austin and Charlotte and Atlanta are not "the south"
as you ****wits think of it?

Even your fellow backward bigot knows that
Atlanta and Austin are not "the south" in the same sense all of
Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas and South Carolina
are. They're the best parts of the south, and you dumb cousin-****ing
rednecks hate them because they're good.

Oh, so now Georgia and Texas are in the North.

Nope - not what I said. You see, the southern *mis*-education system
has ****ed over your ability to read and comprehend beyond repair.

Atlanta and Austin are geographically in the south, but not culturally
and intellectually - at least, not as much as the backward ******** you
inhabit.

Just face the facts: the south is backward, has always been backward,
and likely always will be backward. Except for a few places that have
been culturally invaded by people from elsewhere in the country, the
south is a cultural and intellectual cesspool.