View Single Post
  #59   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
Mike Marlow[_2_] Mike Marlow[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,710
Default OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha

Larry Jaques wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:34:30 -0700, "CW" wrote:



"Han" wrote in message
...

"CW" wrote in
m:



"Mike Marlow" wrote in message
...

Han wrote:
"Mike Marlow" wrote in
:

Han wrote:



My personal feeling is that if there is a chance you can prevent
a lifetime of suffering, for instance by in vitro fertilization
and checking whether the embryo does suffer from a genetic
defect, then you should consider that.


The point is... what is that "lifetime of suffering" that you and
Larry talk about? Fine for you to think about that in the context
of your own perfect lives, but do your really know anyone who
lives these conditions? Have you really ever met and gotten to
know anyone who is really living through this stuff - or are you
guys just "deciding" for them what should be, based on what you
think, but do not know? I think both you and Larry have a lot to
learn...

I have not been personally involved, and once there is a child I'd
likely do anything to help that child,

Well - they are all around you, so why not go and do all of that
"anything to help that child"? Sorry Han - but this is just so much
BS. These people are all around us. To say "if...." is just a
bluff. I really do not see you as that kind of guy...



but read up on OI, and the
suffering involved.

"suffering"? As in the use of that term to justify your killing off
of those people? How about - they do suffer through things, but
suffering is not a word that they would apply to their own lives -
that is you word to make yourself feel comfortable in killing them
off before they are born. They would tell you that life sucks for
them in some respects, but that life is very good for them in
others. You really need to research OI more Han. Like everything
else you "research" here... Look deeper.


I am not sure that the disease is really
inherited, more likely a "sporadic" mutation, so you wouldn't know
until it is too late.

So what - big deal. It is what it is.


OTOH, there are tests for Huntington's and
other diseases. If that were to run in a family, I'd want to know
and take precautions so my children wouldn't get it.

And so - would you kill those children just so you did not have one
with that condition?
================================================== ===============
At no point did he advocate killing anyone. I don't agree with Han a
lot of the time but in this case, he makes perfect sense.


Thanks, CW. I don't think that Mike Marlow unsderstood fully what I
was trying to say.
================================================== ====================
He fully understood. He is a pro lifer that believes that abortion
should never be an option and pregnant woman should give birth no
matter what. The fact that the kid might be born no matter what the
problem, including cases where the mothers life is in danger. Pro
life? No, it's anti woman.


+1, CW.


-1 or -10 or whatever you facebook idiots use. It's no surprise that Larry
would post such a thing.

--

-Mike-