Lets roll!
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:10:56 -0400, "
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:03:21 -0500, "Atila Iskander"
wrote:
"Doug" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:17:49 -0500, "Atila Iskander"
wrote:
"Doug" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:37:05 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote:
Doug wrote:
I wasn't but now I will..... personally I think everyone who wants a
gun (with some restrictions) should be allowed to have a gun legally.
I'm not in favor of taking guns away from people (in most cases).
I'll go farther. Everybody who wants a gun should have one PROVIDED by
the
government (if they can't afford one on their own).
Here's the rationale: The courts have held that an individual charged
with
a
crime is entitled to a lawyer, at state expense if necessary, so that
his
constitutional right to legal representation can be fulfilled.
It follows that if we have a right to own a gun...
Interesting opinion but expense of representation for me doesn't
equate to having the ability to kill someone.
Where do you presume you have to go out and kill someone ?
Presume no, potential yes
The word equate does NOT mean "potential by any stretch of the English
language
And if you're male, then does the fact that you have a penis mean that
you're automatically a "potential" rapist ?
And if you're female does your vagina, mean that your automatically a
"potential" prostitute ?
You're really really grasping at straws.
No, logic is not the leftie's strong suit.
Say that or call me names, doesn't matter.
I have no problem with people having guns legally as long as they're
qualified to do so. I also want some better accountability who has a
legal gun. That reminds me, recently I heard on the radio that the
NRA also believes in restrictions tho I don't know if that's true nor
what restrictions but that's what I heard.
|