On 19 Jul 2012 17:17:34 GMT, Han wrote:

" wrote in
:

On 19 Jul 2012 11:46:49 GMT, Han wrote:

" wrote in
:

...and further wondering that why it is that now, warming follows
CO2 when the record shows that it has *always* led CO2. That
"science" has always escaped me. Of course then there is that "heat
island" thing. ...and the outright lies by the "scientists" who are
profiting from "global warming". Nah, nothing about the "science"
to be concerned about.

Well, there is a "re" in research ...

That is indeed a factoid (if it isindeed true - have to stay at least
as skeptical as others) that I cannot explain, but it has nothing,
absolutely nothing to do with the unassailable fact that we are
generating CO2 by burning wood and fossil fuels.

So what?!

It seems to me to be logical to conclude
that that CO2 is at least contributing to the roughly doubled quantity
of CO2 in the atmosphere, and that such CO2 could be at least one
factor in the global warming process.

No, it's not logical to conclude anything of the kind. You take it as
faith; i.e. religion.

Sorry, I don't do faith (others may do as they want).

Oh, but you do. Worse then the most devout Christain, you won't admit it to
yourself.

But I can read
English and separate most facts from most fiction. I do cry wolf ...

Which causes people to laugh at you.