View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Hawke[_3_] Hawke[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,024
Default What's Mitt "Flip Flop" Romney hiding?...Show us the money Mitt!!!!

On 7/15/2012 8:20 PM, wrote:
On Jul 15, 8:10 pm, Hawke wrote:


You are just a non thinking idiot that blathers the same drivel over
and over.


I was just going to say the same thing to you.

The tax code is exactly what Congress wants it to be. Congress
created all those deductions for various reasons, even if you are too
stupid to realise it. And it is working exactly as they want it to
work.


Dan


Well, your wrong, just like you always are, and never seem to learn no
matter how often you are shown the truth. You're not nearly as smart,
educated, or a knowledgeable as you think you are. You're just an
ordinary guy who has fallen for all the propaganda of the right. You can
recite it all back very nicely but as far as you knowing the facts of
what has gone on and why, how things really came about, and who was
actually running things you are sadly lacking. It's too bad but you're
no different from Rush, Beck, and Hannity, all of whom are singularly
impressed with themselves and how much they think they know. In reality
they are not impressive men with high intellects or very much knowledge.
None of them are educated. They are in fact just ordinary guys who think
they are far better than they are. In that regard they are just like you.

Hawke


No you are the one that is wrong. Congress creates the tax code , and
it is therefore obvious to the most casual observer that the tax code
is exactly what Congress wants it to be. May not be what you think it
should be, and I am sure some members of Congress think it should be
different. But the fact is that the tax code is exactly what Congress
made it. Maybe I should say it is obvious to everyone except idiots
that the tax code is what Congress wanted it to be.kn



All you are doing is giving an opinion you have that is not backed up
with an education in political science or law. God knows what
qualifications and expertise you have to be commenting on the law, and
politics. Obviously you have no formal training in either area yet you
are making comments like you are some kind of a professional. You're
acting just like Pimpleton now.

For your information, the laws congress creates do not always turn out
the way they wanted them to. Many times what they intended does not
happen and often it turns out the opposite of what they were trying to
do. It's like passing a tariff that is supposed to protect American
business but the result is it winds up hurting the very business they
wanted to protect. Even you probably know an example where this
happened. So you know that congress does not accomplish exactly what
they want every time they pass a law. This applies to tax law as well.
Many times the intent of the law does not wind up to be what congress
wanted. You know that. Then you come here and say the tax law is exactly
what congress wants when you know of cases where that isn't true. That
makes your argument irrelevant, worthless, and wrong.


And I am as smart, educated , and knowledgeable as I think I am. And
even smarter, better educated, and more knowlegeable that you think
you are.


You're entitled to that opinion even though it isn't supported by any
factual evidence.



Hey you are the one that brought up intelligence, education , and
knowledge.



Yep, I do that every time the topic is something where those things are
important. I know how intelligent I am, how much formal education I have
too and that only 4% of the population has more than I do. As for
knowledge I know that I have far more of that than most people do too.
You'd be very lucky to actually know more than me. You clearly know more
than me in some technical areas. But you don't know all the areas where
I know more than you do and you like to pretend those areas don't exist
so you can see yourself as better. But that's just your opinion of
yourself and in my view you over rate yourself. And not by a small margin.

Hawke