On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:34:55 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote:

On Jun 28, 9:24*pm, (M.A. Stewart) wrote:
harry ) writes:
On Jun 28, 7:19=A0pm, "Steve B" wrote:
Facetious, obviously, but any homeowner knows that stuff wears out an=
d
has to be replaced. =A0IMHO, estimated payback periods do not conside=
r
this in their calculations.

And, a home powered by solar would cost a chunk of change to power just s=
ome
light bulbs, and a small TV. =A0If you want microwave, clothes dryers, ov=
ens,
toasters, and other stuff, you will have to fork out substantially more i=
n
the beginning.

Amortized over time, it is worthless, unless you want to live in a cave w=
ith
one small light bulb.

Steve

Talking your usual drivel I see.
I export more power than I consume. I have a solar passive house and I
have no fuel bills at all.
The net financial benefit of my house is almost $6000/year compared
with a standard house.
But we are more advanced in Europe.

Advanced??? Then why do your automobiles pollute the air?

Fact: 99.999% of automobiles licensed to go on the road in
Europe, since 1970, _HAVE NOT_ been allowed on the roads of
North America. Reason... they don't meet the California/USA/
Canadian emission regulations!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There a virtually no American cars anywhere but America. Why do you
suppose that is?

Really? You've never seen a Ford or GM car in Europe? What a liar, you are,
harry.