View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARWadsworth ARWadsworth is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,688
Default Apprentice bollockings for this week

H. Neary wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 22:32:05 +0100, "ARWadsworth"
wrote:

H. Neary wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:45:29 +0100, "ARWadsworth"
wrote:

1. Not doing the weekly vehicle checks [1] properly and letting
vans go out with bald tyres.

2. Putting 6.30am down on his time sheets instead of 8.00am -
Apprentices do not get paid travel time. Although to be fair
one of the electricians told him to put 6.30 on his sheets just
to see him get into trouble when he asked what time to put on
the sheets. (same apprentice also got a bollocking for doing
the same a few months ago)

3. Using "text speak" on his job report forms. I heard the
words "I do not want to read **** like that" shouted as he
handed them in.

[1] All vehicle checks have a signed and dated form so we know
who checks which van each week.
I would suspect that any company not willing to pay it's
employees for their work, wouldn't be too keen on them "wasting
time" on vehicle checks. Have they been trained in the process
BTW?


Yes. And most of them have their own cars.

Perhaps the person accepting the reports could be trained in the
use of English and anger management?

I do not shout at personnel, I do not resort to filth when
communicating and I always explain carefully if I think a higher
level of input to a task is needed.


Well I can ignore that ****ing waste of space advice.


You shouldn't. Foul language and shouting betrays a lack of education
and an inability to communicate.


So how do you give out a bollocking then?


Mind you, my company does pay for hours worked [unless salaried],
and we have a genuine "no blame" culture that seems to motivate
the workforce in a very positive way.


You would survive about 5 seconds on a building site.


My work is often on civils sites. I do quite well actually. We would
not go out of our way to advertise such errors as the odd missing
cable number, but anything affecting health and saftey or the overall
quality of the job is snagged and corrected.

My only problem on site is trying to relate to thick ******* that rely
on their own weird interpretation of HSE guidance to impose pointless
trivial dictats on contractors.


The site foreman dictates the HSE rules he wants to use, and what he says
goes. If you have a problem with HSE then you deal with the site foreman.

I have enough problems dealing with plasterers cutting cables, plumbers
burning cables and YEDL turning up just after we have made an illegal
connection to a cut out. And last week it was a project manager asking
labourers to cut cables!

--
Adam