On Wed, 30 May 2012 20:52:50 +0100
hugh ] wrote:

In message
-sep
tember.org, Tim writes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Jules Richardson wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote:
The car is actually painted on to the van behind it.
As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it?

well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van..

But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it?


Can we be sure it isn't a van built onto the back of a painting?

Tim
A Van Gogh perhaps?

That sounds even better in American.
--
Davey.