On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:11:36 -0700, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Larry J. Winfield" wrote in message
...
Moreover, how exactly was he "alive" to be "killed?"

Bin Laden was known to have serious health issues due to kidney
failure in 2001. He was reported to be on kidney dialysis by
numerous different intelligence agencies.

The documented average life span of a male kidney patient on
dialysis is 5.8 years. This is the average of ALL male kidney
patients from age 0-14 through 85+. The youngest live an
average of 18.9 years, scaling downward to 1.9 years at age 85+.

The older a patient is, the shorter their lifespan.

Osama Bin Laden was born March 10, 1957.

In 2001, Osama Bin Laden would have been 44 years of age.

His expected lifespan for age 44 would have been 8.1 years under
optimal conditions with the best medical care.

This means Osama Bin Laden would have been close to death or
dead in late 2008 or 2009.

Kidneys don't get better on their own and they get progressively
worse during dialysis treatment.

Osama should have been dead two years before he was killed.

Reality is nature's way of keeping things straight. My aunt was on dialysis
for over twenty years. She fell whole visiting the Queen Mary in Long
Beach, and died from complications from that.

I am alive ten years after a 5 way bypass and aortic valve replacement.

Sheesh, people. Just because it says it somewhere doesn't mean it is just
like that and only like that. There are outlyers, or exceptions to
everything. And even in Pakistan, there is good medical treatment if you
have money. Medical tourism is big bucks, and one can go to India and have
heart surgery for one tenth of what the US docs want.

Do a little reading and researching, will ya.

Morons.

Steve

And an "average" of 5 years can have the numbers really skewed by a
few deaths on the table or within the first 2 years - allowing a few
to reach 20 or 30 years. Not as many as die early - of course.