"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Home Guy wrote:

In the landscape of consumer products, firearms stand alone as being
inately dangerous while serving no useful purpose in the hands of
consumers.

All alone? What about other weapons? The purpose is to defend
yourself from an equally armed criminal.

Firearms makers enjoy conspicuous freedom from law suits and
regulators by consumers when their products cause injury or death.

That's one thing they do when used for defense/LE. They also
provide millions with pleasurable hobbies.

The idea that the right to bear arms was intended so that citizens can
protect themselves from unconstitutional acts performed by their own
gov't is hogwash if not impractical.

It hasn't been tested in that way yet.

The only thing that the right to bear arms has given the citizens of the
United States is pain, misery and suffering.

I love shooting at paper from a distance, no different from golf
in my mind.



You know that you are trying to argue rationally and intelligently with a
mindless hoplophobe