View Single Post
  #53   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Attila.Iskander Attila.Iskander is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default OT Gun law US style.


"HeyBub" wrote in message
m...
Home Guy wrote:
gonjah wrote:

Should we outlaw cars too harry?


Can consumers sue gun companies for product liability / defective
product reasons like they can for cars or other consumer products?



You would NEED to prove that the gun was defective for such a suit


If an old lady can sue McDonalds because she burned herself when she
spilled a hot coffee, then why can't a home owner sue Smith & Wesson
or Colt because their product did not have enough built-in safety
mechanisms to prevent accidental injury or death?


What makes you think they don't ?
Oh wait, you are stupid.


If normal consumer product tort and liability laws applied to gun
companies as they do to all other consumer product companies, there
would be a much different gun situation in the US. Guns would be more
expensive and much safer to handle when exposed to children for
example.



Clearly you are clueless about tort and liability laws


Civil suits arising from damages caused by firearms are specifically
prohibited by "The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act," (2005), and
became Public Law 109-02 (15 USC 7901 et seq. ).

See
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-10...-109publ92.pdf


They were made illegal because there was a concerted effort to sue the
companies NOT because of any wrongdoing but simply because they were gun
manufacturers
The intent was to bleed them out with frivolous lawsuits
The intent and purpose of the law was to such such lawsuits.