On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:08:04 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message
newsp.wdht36rwytk5n5@i7-940...
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:32:18 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 28/04/2012 20:30, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:07:33 +0100, kent wrote:

On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 20:05:20 UTC+1, Jim K wrote:








nope! Thought of it all by myself! Is it that stupid then?

Only as stupid as having two engines in your car.


What if it was cheaper, and possibly more efficient, to couple two
smaller engines together?

That did happen in a few cars, I think it was more for performance though.

And I don't believe it could be cheaper and possibly more efficient to
couple two boilers.

It can be more efficient anyway, particular with as he said
originally, each serving a different part of the house.

It's the servicing (which apparently a lot of fools pay for every year) that would cost a lot. Most likely a lot more than you'd save on gas.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

The gene pool could use a little chlorine.