"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message
news
p.wdht36rwytk5n5@i7-940...
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:32:18 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
On 28/04/2012 20:30, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:07:33 +0100, kent wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 20:05:20 UTC+1, Jim K wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:57:44 +0100, kent wrote:
This is probably a daft idea, but I'd be interesting to see if
there is
any mileage in it! Combi boilers tend to work best in smaller
properties, so for a larger property would it be possible (or make
any
sense) to have 2 combi boilers serving different parts of the house?
By "larger" I don't mean a mansion I mean a 4 bedroomed house with 3
showers!
Thanks for any thoughts on this.
ah the old ones are always the best....
nope! Thought of it all by myself! Is it that stupid then?
Only as stupid as having two engines in your car.
What if it was cheaper, and possibly more efficient, to couple two
smaller engines together?
That did happen in a few cars, I think it was more for performance though.
And I don't believe it could be cheaper and possibly more efficient to
couple two boilers.
--
The average person over 50 will have spent 5 years waiting in lines.
Don't believe that even in that soggy little island.