John Rumm wrote:
On 26/04/2012 21:42, John Williamson wrote:
Bob Eager wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:10:31 +0100, dennis@home wrote:


"John Rumm" wrote in message
o.uk...


Lol, to a non existent group *again!*

(Incoming clue by 4: there is no group called dev.null, dev is not a
valid top level organisation)
You need a better provider, it exists here or it would complain of an
unresolved group.

No, it doesn't. You can't even copy the name correctly.



Be fair, it *was* ROTted. :-)

Next time, make it harder, used double ROT13 ;-)

Task you should know from the DES experience that when DES was found to be
weak a stab at 2DES was taken without much improvement. It was therefore
necessary to adopt 3DES. Hence 3ROT13 must be the best algorithm.