Jo Stein wrote:
Den 21.04.2012 17:53, skrev harry:
On Apr 21, 4:16 pm, Bob wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:11:02 +0100, Tim Streater wrote:
In ,
Jo wrote:
...
Not completely wrong. In the long run an accelertion is
going to win.
The sea level is accelerating today and this acceleration
can only be
stopped by reducing the extra energy that has resently been
stored in
the sea. How will you reduce the extra energy stored in the
sea?
What*are* you talking about. Nothing you've written so far
makes any
sense at all.
It all sounds scarily like Drivel.
He's talking about methane clathrates in the deep ocean and tipping
points.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methane...imate_c hange
His English is bad but he has a valid point.
My english is bad because I am a Norwegian. I am talking about sea level
rise caused by the increased level of CO2.
James Hansen knows more about that:
James Hansen is a farid more or less.
Next?
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...s-is-too-late/
Dr. Hansen then went on to describe some of the recent science,
including a detailed look at the Earths energy imbalance that was
made possible by data from 3000 Argo floats that measure ocean
temperature at different depths. Dr. Hansen said that the current
imbalance of 0.6 watts/square meter (which does not include the
energy already used to cause the current warming of 0.8°C) was
equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs every day, 365
days per year.
JH agrees with me; we need a lot of clean energy which is nuclear energy.
Not last time I heard.
He was all for wanking machines ^H^H^H^H^H^ wind mills.
--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.