On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:39:10 +0200, Jo Stein wrote:
Den 21.04.2012 17:53, skrev harry:
On Apr 21, 4:16 pm, Bob wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:11:02 +0100, Tim Streater wrote:
In ,
Jo wrote:
...
Not completely wrong. In the long run an accelertion is going
to win. The sea level is accelerating today and this
acceleration can only be stopped by reducing the extra energy
that has resently been stored in the sea. How will you reduce
the extra energy stored in the sea?
What*are* you talking about. Nothing you've written so far
makes any sense at all.
It all sounds scarily like Drivel.
He's talking about methane clathrates in the deep ocean and tipping
points.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Methane_clathrate#Methane_clathrates_and_climate_c hange
His English is bad but he has a valid point.
My english is bad because I am a Norwegian. I am talking about sea level
rise caused by the increased level of CO2. James Hansen knows more about
that:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...es-hansen-ted-
talk-co2-10-years-is-too-late/
Dr. Hansen then went on to describe some of the recent science,
including a detailed look at the Earths energy imbalance that was
made possible by data from 3000 Argo floats that measure ocean
temperature at different depths. Dr. Hansen said that the current
imbalance of 0.6 watts/square meter (which does not include the
energy already used to cause the current warming of 0.8°C) was
equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs every day, 365
days per year.
JH agrees with me; we need a lot of clean energy which is nuclear
energy.
Now, that I do agree with.
--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor