Grammer and spieling
In article ,
Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
Adam Funk wrote:
On 2012-04-18, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Andy Champ wrote:
Sometimes you have to be careful. I insure my car to ensure I can
afford a replacement; an American would use the same spelling for
both.
(Possibly, but not always.)
yeah but they took burglar - derived from the verb to burgle, and
recreated a new verb called 'burglarize'.
In short if they can add syllables they will and anything goes..
Actually "burglar" & "burglarize" are *both* contemporaneous
back-formations (1871 & 1872, respectively, according to the OED) from
"burglar" (1268), rather like "peddle" (1650) from "pedlar/peddler"
(1307).
Of course, I agree that "burgle" is aesthetically better than
"burglarize" (just as I think "legitimate" & "administer" are better
than "legitimize" or "legitimatize" & "administrate").
For openers all these "words" should be spelt -ise anyway. And if you
accept them, next thing we know there'll be a new word - burglariser -
which will in turn spawn a new verb ad nauseam.
the worst I came across was "compostionize" for "compose"
--
From KT24
Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18
|