On 15/04/2012 00:02, geoff wrote:
In message , Dave N
writes

Simply to dismiss his ideas out of hand is unworthy, especially of
someone who implies having undertaken academic research for himself in
the past.

Hopefully, somebody with an open and enquiring mind will be along
shortly. With luck, it will be somebody who is able to contemplate and
respond to unfamiliar ideas without being unnecessarily offensive.


Well, I haven't read it, but then, neither have I been trampled to death
by droves of informed scientists rushing to adopt his ideas

Given that the paper was only published on 30 March 2012, why would
anyone expect that? His research findings are obviously tentative and
subject to further thought and peer review, so why would any reasonable
person "rush to adopt his ideas" at this early stage?

That does not, however, preclude discussion of the *potential*
ramifications of his ideas.

--
Dave N