Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote:
Porsche did it in 1936 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen
And near 50 years later, the Beetle finally got half decent rear
suspension...
The Super Beetle was a true update but came in 1971 which was only 35
years later.
Not much difference between 35 and 50 at my age. ;-)
I can't think what car or development aligns with 1986 (1936+50) .
The New Beetle came 62 years later (1998) and was a completely different
car being FWD.
At least it was still a VW, unlike the Mini. ;-)
FWD cars typically have relatively primitive rear suspensions and still
handle pretty well because the rear suspension of a FWD car doesn't
have a lot to do but keep the rear bumper from dragging on the
pavement! ;-)
That's what many makers would have you belive as it keeps costs down. But
the better handling FWD cars also have decent rear suspension.
Agreed.
trailing arms and a rear beam is..vile.
the original mini with its traling arms and IIRC a sort of wishbone
arrangement was infinitely superior. Minis were almost impossible to get
into a silly state, but the Morris 1100 was easy to get into a tail
slapper on a trailing throttle. Vile.
I think the second best FWD I have driven was the Punto. Oddly enough
that cornered very predictably. Golfs were not bad either ISTR.
--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.