On 4/5/2012 7:33 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/5/2012 5:37 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/5/2012 2:24 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/5/2012 12:17 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/4/2012 6:39 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/4/2012 5:36 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/4/2012 1:30 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
I am convinced that Ptooey was born, relative to most, with a silver
spoon in his mouth. I don't necessarily mean he was the offspring of
0.001 percenters, just that his parents were affluent. He has
written
that he lives off investments yet is only in his early 60s, but his
description of his working life does not paint a picture of someone
who
made a lot of money, invested it well and now has earned the
right to
live well in an earlier retirement than most people can imagine.
No -
Ptooey definitely gives the impression of someone who is living well
off
investments others made. You simply don't live off investments if
your
working career was spent dabbling as a tennis instructor, paralegal
and
other modestly paid pursuits.

Because Ptooey didn't earn his financial security, he takes it for
granted, as do so many children of privilege. As with the
Kennedys, he
has a "I've got mine, now **** the rest of you" outlook.


That's known as the aristocratic or country club republican view of
the
world. It must be irritating to know someone like me might be a
member
of that elite group, eh?

You didn't earn it. You were born to privilege. You're a dilettante, a
dabbler, a fainéant. You weren't even able to achieve the biological
imperative. You're a dead end.



It's only so obvious you wish you could belong.

Gotcha!


Ha!,

Heh heh heh...

Funny is how bad you want to be a member of the elite class but can't
be. Do you knock Mitt Romney for being successful? How about his sons
who he's given millions to? Is that wrong or not? You seem to think it
is for me but not for people like the Romneys. Why the double standard?

Hawke