View Single Post
  #302   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Hawke[_3_] Hawke[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,024
Default OT Is the George Plimpton who posts here an artificial intelligencebot?

On 4/4/2012 6:36 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/4/2012 5:30 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/4/2012 5:08 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/4/2012 5:05 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/3/2012 2:11 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/3/2012 1:39 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 4/2/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 4/2/2012 11:11 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/31/2012 10:10 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

The laugh would be on you if you met me in person because you
would
find
the same thing

You don't have a ****ing clue what you're talking about. You're
clueless, including your ****witted belief that people think
you're
knowledgeable.


The only people who don't know that are

Everyone knows you're not a smart or clever guy.


The only people who don't know that are

Everyone knows you're not a smart or clever guy.


You aren't a very good listener. I told you that every one who
knows me
knows that I am not just a smart guy but I'm also a very
knowledgeable
one too.

You ****ing idiot: being smart *means* being knowledgeable. And no, no
one believes that people who know you consider you smart. *We* who
suffer through your pedantic bull**** here "know" you, and you're not
smart.


You don't know anything.

We know you well enough to know you're not smart - not about anything.



You are too dumb to know that smart and intelligent mean the same thing.


They don't. I explained this. Intelligent means having the ability to
learn easily and quickly. Being smart means *having* learned, regardless
of how long or how much effort it took. I know some smart people who
aren't particularly intelligent, but they have excellent work habits and
over time they acquired a lot of knowledge. I know intelligent people
who aren't very smart because they're intellectually lazy. I think
George W. Bush was one such. He is actually reasonably well above
average in intelligence, but because he's lazy and not curious about
anything, he never applied his intelligence and so never learned much -
he's not smart.

You, of course, are neither.



As usual you're just plain wrong. Smart refers to someone that learns
quickly and easily. When you have learned then you are knowledgeable and
it doesn't matter how quickly it comes. You can be smart and know
nothing. Same with intelligent. You can be intelligent and have no
knowledge. The truth is smart and intelligent are synonyms. Ignorance
and knowledgeable mean the opposite. You have the two confused. JK told
you the same thing and for once he was right about something.

Which only goes to prove once again that you don't know near as much as
you believe you do and regardless of how intelligent you may be you
aren't very knowledgeable about very many things.

Hawke