On 3/29/2012 5:26 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/26/2012 11:50 AM, jk wrote:
wrote:


No, you ****wit - writing "I have known about Bob Dole from his days in
WWII when he got wounded" implies that you were *there*, you clumsy
plodding idiot.

Any normal person can understand exactly what I meant. A dimwit, no.

What we know is what we read from your writing. This isn't
rec.psychics.

Did you think that I meant I was there in WWII with Bob Dole?

Your sentence structure implied it, dummy.


Your reading comprehension is what sucks.

YOu have already shown that it is your comphrension that sucks.

My reading comprehension is as good as it gets.

It's atrocious.


I never dabbled in anything. The first thing that made me interested in
politics was the Vietnam war. See, I was eligible for the draft back
then
So what, so was I

If that kind of thing wasn't enough to spark an interest in politics
than what would?

He didn't say he didn't have an interest in it, stupid.



Your writing is **** - indicative of the thinking behind it.

They didn't say that when they wanted one of my papers to be published
in a textbook.

Yeah, right.

That happens to be true.

Bull****. Term papers aren't published in textbooks.


Then why don't you show us some of your ability here? Your writing style
looks like high school level. Everything you write is so full of
invectives and personal insults that there is no argument anyone can
find. Look at what you wrote here. Is that the best you can do? It's
pretty damn bad. Your work isn't good enough to qualify you to criticize
anyone else's. The only thing good about you is how good you think you
are and you're way off base. You're average. So how come you think
you're so damn great? It's all a fantasy you created. In reality you're
just an average Joe in a newsgroup that's pretending to be a superhero.
It's pretty pathetic really.
Wow, everything you wrote is true of George, but is equally true of
yourself as well. Except, that it is true that he lards his with more
insults than you do, but not by much.


No it's not true.

It's true.


If you have read this thread it's Pimpton who
continually claims his superiority in every regard.

Nope. For the most part, I merely point out how you *aren't* superior.