View Single Post
  #115   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
dennis@home dennis@home is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,369
Default dennis is moving to Bristol



"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
dennis@home wrote:



"Tim Watts" wrote in message
news
dennis@home wrote:



"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...

8

That 99% of accidents are caused by stupid drivers or bad luck, not
failure to keep exactly to arbitrary speed limits?

No, 99% of accidents are caused because the driver was going too fast.
Luck is not required.

Cite please...


Cite a car accident where it would have happened if the car wasn't going
slower.
More than 1%?


No, you cite - you're the one making the assertion.


Well I have, there are less than 1% of car accidents where if the driver was
driving slow enough they would not have happened.
Virtually all accidents are avoidable by one of the parties as they are
nearly all driver error.


And you should defined "too fast". Do you mean:

a) Too fast for the conditions

b) Above the legal speed limit for the road in question?


Neither, too fast for the participants to avoid the accident.

Its like this.. if you can foresee an accident happening, you would slow
down to avoid it.
Some drivers do this better than others.
They are the ones that the poor drivers say are driving too slow.
The fact the poor drivers have been held up prevents the accident happening
so they never get to see what the hazard was reinforcing their mistaken
beliefs that the good driver was driving too slow.

Its when the poor drivers get to make the decisions that they crash.