On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:16:14 -0500, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:


"Han" wrote in message
.. .
"HeyBub" wrote in
news

In the case of guns, the U.S. is unique in asserting that "the right
to keep an bear arms shall not be infringed." Some states and city
jurisdictions take one extreme view of guns and require governmental
permission, of one sort or another, to own or buy a gun, other
jurisdictions do not.

I'm not in favor of a Wild West mentality in cities.


There you go being ignorant again
The so-called Wild West was a MUCH SAFER place than Eastern Seaboard cities,
like Boston, New York, etc during the same period
And with all the States that have relaxed if not dumped their restrictions
on carry over the last 30 years, that paranoia about "Wild West mentality in
cities." is just that IGNORANT PARANOIA. that is COMPLETELY UNSUPPORTED BY
ANY evidence.

Evidence. Lefties don't need no steenkin' evidence! They have their precious
"feelings".






Slowly, but surely, the notion that self-defense as an unassailable
right is creeping 'cross the land and that personal weapons tending to
assert that right should not be challenged.

That is very regrettable, IMO (and I do know there are other opinions).

Why is it "regrettable" ?


I can just see someone getting in an argument on a crowded subway
platform (and I've seen arguments). Would you want to see anyone, anyone
at all, start shooting.


OH YAWN !
You really need to do some self-education BEFORE you continue spouting such
ignorant Brady Bunch talking points.






Regrettably, there will be accidents or misfortune connected with the
unfettered availability of guns. That's the price we must accept, just
like traffic accidents are the price for driving.

Avoidable accidents should be avoided. We have seatbelts and airbags
now, right?

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid