On 3/25/2012 9:26 PM, Jim Yanik wrote:
gonjahgonjah.net wrote in
net:

On 3/25/2012 7:39 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:54:30 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:11:40 -0500, Jim
wrote:

defense with a handgun has the least risk and best success for
one's self,which is what you the defender is concerned about,not
the wellbeing of your attacker.
If I can stab an attacker, with a small blade. and hit the jugular
I'll save some ammo.
more likely,you may not get the chance to stab,particularly with a guy with
a long reach like a 6foot plus person has. you might hit a button or other
hard object that stops your blade. you more likely might just wound him and
REALLY anger him.

For the $.25, I'd prefer not to have to clean the blade.
A boy lost his life.


through unwise actions of his own choice.


Regardless of what M did you can't deny Z should not have followed M. Or
do you think it's okay to harass innocent young men because they are
black and wearing hoodies?

That's the part you seem to ignore. M *was* doing NOTHING wrong. He was
targeted and followed by an older man for no reason other than he was black.