On 3/22/2012 5:38 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/21/2012 4:03 PM, jk wrote:
wrote:




What was "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" about, Mr. Title-reader? How
about "Catch-22"?

You're so stupid you think "EVERY" book is explained by its title?
They're not. But many are. If you don't get what Senator for Sale is
about you are an idiot.
He based it on what you said. "Titles tell you what the book is
about."
A clear unequivocal statement.

If you don't want your posts used to make you look like an idiot, quit
posting idiotic things.

So let me understand this, you're saying that saying the title of a book
tells you what the book is about is idiotic?

Saying that the title of the book makes the case is idiotic, you ****ing
cheeselog.


You mean like Cranston, DeConcini, Glenn and Riegle?

Now if I were you I'd say something like, you only heard things about
them. You don't know anything about them. You have no proof they used
their office to get rich. But we all know all those guys probably cashed
in, don't we. But when I say Dole did and was a king at it somehow it's
all different.

I don't recall him ever saying Dole was honest. All he did that I can
recall, is attack your basis for saying otherwise.

Do you ever remember him giving you a good reason why what I said was
not true?

Because it's not established. It's nothing but an allegation.

What the **** is wrong with you, bitch? You think when you make some
wild, irresponsible and essentially slanderous charge, that it is
considered true until someone disproves it? Not the way it works,
bitch. *YOU* have to make the case that it's true, with verifiable
evidence, and until you do, it's considered "not proved."


The same way any author know about the subject he's writing the book
about. They do research. In this case not only did the writer do
research on Dole but he had personal experience with him too. Who better
to write about someone?


In fact the title merely imply's he was for sale, NOT that he was
bought and paid for.

Right, and when you drive down the street and see a car parked there
with a sign on it that says "for sale" that doesn't mean that car
is for
sale.

It doesn't mean a sale has happened, you stupid ****.

A car out on the street with a for sale sign on it has been bought at
least once. Don't bother pretending you see new cars on the street with
for sale signs on them.

Irrelevant, and I can think of at least 3 ways that a car that had
never been sold, could end up with a for sale sign on it.

Now you're getting the same disease that Pimpleton has, exceptionitis.

Now he's simply pointing out that you're full of **** - illogical,
irrational and full of ****.