On 3/20/2012 4:40 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/20/2012 3:45 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 12:47 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

I have a least seen the book in person, picked it up, looked at it and
read some of it.

"I haven't read the book." -- Hawke-Ptooey


I haven't.

So, you don't know your ass from your face - as usual.

The question is what does that make you? You say **** about me for not
having read the book and you haven't either. You don't see that makes
you the same as me? Knowing you, probably not.


You also wrote, "But it was written...by someone who was on his staff
for a long time." The author of the hatchet job, Stanley Hilton, wrote
that he worked as an aide to Dole "...back in 1979 and 1980." That's not
a long time, and he was not in any position to see how Dole made his
money.

Says who?

How would he have been?


I'd say being on someone's staff more than two years

It *wasn't* more than two years, you plodding drooling ****.


is a long time. What is a short time? Whatever you say it is. The author
was an aide to Dole for years.

Less than two, long before he wrote the book.

That's a long time, you cracker. Plenty long enough to see what kind of
operator Dole was.


Once again, you reveal your slovenliness and reckless disregard for
facts.

And you again reveal you are only out to find trivial bull**** to nit
pick.

It's not trivial. It goes to the very core of your character, which we
can see is pure ****.

You can't see anything. In fact even when you do the exact same thing as
I do you don't know it's the same. You have ragged on me for not reading
the book yet you haven't either. That's nuts. You're insane.


Why don't you refute the accusations about Dole?

What accusations? All you've put out there is innuendo; not a single
concrete accusation.

You mean like you do about me? Accusations with nothing to back them up
whatsoever. I didn't put it out you moron. I read about it. It was other
people who have known and worked with Dole who said he was out to get
rich from his job. I only read what they said.


You are criticizing the messenger when you don't know anything about
the
book.

I don't see where he is making claims on what the book says, but even
if he did, I guess if he has also seen the cover, that would put you
on equal footing.

We are not on equal footing. I've held the book in my hands

What the ****...you can absorb the text through the palms of your hands?
You stupid flabby douchebag.

The stupidity is that you can't even grasp that having found the book in
the library, taken down from the shelf, looked it over, read some
passages from it, and got a real idea what it's about, puts me

...in the toilet, again.

Puts me far ahead of you in knowing anything about that book. You've
never seen it in person. I have. Funny thing is you act like I know
nothing about it and you're a ****ing expert on it. Well, you aren't.
Neither am I but at least I've seen the damn thing myself. You can't
even say that.



You didn't see a single concrete accusation in your slovenly perusal of
the book. You read the jacket; no more.

Well, there you go again, Jr. Making it up as you go. You go on and on
about my sloppiness and here you are just plain making up outright lies.
You have now officially taken over Gummer's position as the biggest liar
on the group. You must be proud.


Hawke