djc wrote:
On 14/03/12 19:39, Adrian Simpson wrote:
In article , hugh
] writes
Revaluation should only take place when a property is sold IMO. That
is the only point at which the value of the property has any
relationship with your income.
Most of the houses in my street were built in 1939. Up until 5 years
ago, one of them was still lived in by its original occupant. How would
you have valued that one ?

Why not on its 1939 value. It reflects what the owner could afford in
1939. If they stayed there all that time then : it had not *in their
view* appreciated vis a vis any alternative accommodation they could
afford; if it had they could have moved home and realised the implicit
capital gain.

So, in your view, if people don't change homes, they should pay less,
possibly *much* less in property taxes?

And how would you cope with rented properties?

--
Tciao for Now!

John.