On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:48:00 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:58:13 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:44:53 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:


So, you approve of JF's design here?

Nowhere have I said that, have I?

No, you are careful to not commit one way or the other. If you say
they're good, you'll be lying *and* look like a fool. If you say
they're bad, you'll be betraying a fellow hen\\\ ally.

---
Matter of fact, Jim _did_ take issue with my circuit, but apprised me
of a potential problem via private email.

Wisely, I think, in order to keep your nasty, self-serving vitriol out
of the loop.

In any case, the fix was duck soup and the potential problem is now
solved.

Care to _guess_ what it was?

Attached, for your viewing pleasure, is the schematic.

Enjoy! :-)

--
JF