"harry" wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 5:35 am, dpb wrote:
On 2/23/2012 9:51 PM, wrote:
...

Factually incorrect "fill" doesn't do anyone any good. The problem is
that
the reporters don't know the difference. They're scientifically
illiterate.

Commentators/interviewers aren't being paid to think; they're there
simply as actors to read the script/follow the interview outline to
have
something to put out over the air so the advertisers can be billed for
their air time.

....and that's a good thing?

...

You miss the whole point--the point isn't to do anything good or bad;
it's simply to have a time slot for the broadcasters can charge
advertisers.

The concept of "good" or "bad" never enters into it; only whether they
can continue to sell advertising.

--

I think he believes the viewer should be able to draw some benifit
from watchingTV. Clearly not in this case, the exact opposite in
fact.

It's obvious the that "Fox News" is accustomed to trotting out drivel,
easily provable in this case to anyone with the slightest education.


Go ahead and prove it...
(And I'm willing to bet that your education compared to mine qualifies as
"slightest")

One can conclude that other stuff they come up with is also drivel
though not so easily proved/disproved.


INdeed
One only has to read your posts to see that.


Best not to watch it. Lowered viewing rates is the best way to punish
them.


There you go
So when are you going to stop watching ?

And the creepy kid needs to be put down to prevent him from spreading
his genes.

LOL
Too bad that wasn't true for your parents...