On Feb 22, 5:58*pm, Martin Brown
wrote:
On 22/02/2012 16:32, thirty-six wrote:









On Feb 22, 4:03 pm, The Natural
wrote:
thirty-six wrote:
On Feb 21, 12:53 pm, The Natural
wrote:
thirty-six wrote:
On Feb 20, 11:14 am, Martin
wrote:
On 20/02/2012 10:38, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article
,
* * * *wrote:
Cheap co-axial wire is
most suitable for remote speaker connects and simple ellipticals or
dual cone ellipticals work well for this.
Co-ax for speakers? You live and learn.
It wouldn't surprise me if some power amplifiers reacted to having coax
wire used to connect to speakers by oscillating wildly. You really want
*From which storybook did you find that gem?
Oh its no story. Not a few rather poorly QC'ed or poorly designed amps
will go mad with a capacitor on the output, and coax is a few tens of pF
a foot

There's normally a loudspeaker unit at the end of the wire. *Your
claims are fallacious.

doesn't matter if there is.

The endpoint impedance of the wire at HF/RF is of little impact on its
impedance overall - that's ALL about capacitance and *coax is simply
more capacitative than T& *E. something like 50-150 pF/meter.

Twin lead - 300 ohm ribbon cable - is in the 10-20pF/meter range.

I would expect that T& *E would fall somewhere between the two.

I see you know the square root of **** all about the design -
inadvertent or otherwise - of RF oscillators. Or power amplifiers.

Bull****ter!

ROFL. You spout random buzzword salad and then call him a bull****ter.

Where's this widely oscillating amplifier due to co-axial cable you
speak of?
It seems to me you were doing nothing but ****-stirring. I've not
used any buzzwords intentionally, that's in your imagination and what
I have said is only in response. It seems more likely you can't bear
the thought of being wrong and wasting £100 on speaker wire when some
salvaged co-ax would have done the job better. Almond oil is useful
in getting the sand out of your ears, maybe after treatment you will
hear the difference.