On 22/02/2012 16:32, thirty-six wrote:
On Feb 22, 4:03 pm, The Natural
wrote:
thirty-six wrote:
On Feb 21, 12:53 pm, The Natural
wrote:
thirty-six wrote:
On Feb 20, 11:14 am, Martin
wrote:
On 20/02/2012 10:38, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article
,
wrote:
Cheap co-axial wire is
most suitable for remote speaker connects and simple ellipticals or
dual cone ellipticals work well for this.
Co-ax for speakers? You live and learn.
It wouldn't surprise me if some power amplifiers reacted to having coax
wire used to connect to speakers by oscillating wildly. You really want
From which storybook did you find that gem?
Oh its no story. Not a few rather poorly QC'ed or poorly designed amps
will go mad with a capacitor on the output, and coax is a few tens of pF
a foot

There's normally a loudspeaker unit at the end of the wire. Your
claims are fallacious.

doesn't matter if there is.

The endpoint impedance of the wire at HF/RF is of little impact on its
impedance overall - that's ALL about capacitance and coax is simply
more capacitative than T& E. something like 50-150 pF/meter.

Twin lead - 300 ohm ribbon cable - is in the 10-20pF/meter range.

I would expect that T& E would fall somewhere between the two.

I see you know the square root of **** all about the design -
inadvertent or otherwise - of RF oscillators. Or power amplifiers.

Bull****ter!

ROFL. You spout random buzzword salad and then call him a bull****ter.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown