View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
George Plimpton George Plimpton is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 973
Default "Why do you have a right to your money?"

On 2/18/2012 2:59 PM, wrote:
On Feb 18, 4:34 pm, wrote:



It depends on how I am using the word fair. In a moral sense is it fair
that 1/2 are rich and 1/2 are poor? That would be no.


The answer, of course is "yes", it is fair. Fair does not mean equal.


It has been shown beyond all rational dispute that your definition of
"fairness" is worthless bull****.


Only to you. How I define it is how normal people do it. You can try to
justify having crazy views any way you want but they're still crazy. You
can say smoking tobacco is good for you all you want, but it's not. Your
idea of fair is equally nutty.


Hawke


I do not think that most people would agree with your definition of
fairness. I think most people would agree that it is perfectly fair
for 1/2 the people to be poor and the other half rich , if all the
people have an equal opportunity to be rich. In other words if the
rich are rich because they earned the money and the poor are poor
because they prefered to not spend any time or effort in earning
money, then it is fair that some are rich and some poor.



What people who believe in rough equality of opportunity don't
understand is that totalitarians like Hawke-Ptooey only believe in
equality of *results*. If you take two people of roughly equal innate
ability, give them roughly equal education, and then turn them loose,
then if one of them due to a superior work ethic accumulates a much
greater fortune than the other, Hawke-Ptooey and other "egalitarians"
like him would say the result is "unfair".


In our society not all people have an equal opportunity so some people
are unfairly poor and some are fairly poor. The same for riches. Some
inherit a lot and are unfairly rich and some are rich through their
own efforts and are fairly rich.


I don't see anything unfair about inheriting a fortune for which one
never worked. If I bust my ass and acquire a huge fortune legally and
ethically, and want to leave it to my son, why shouldn't he have it?
What would be unfair would be to interfere with my right to bequeath my
fortune as I see fit.