On 2/8/2012 8:44 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:51:51 -0800, Delvin ýt wrote:

On 2/8/2012 3:20 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:23:30 -0800, Delvin ýt wrote:

On 2/7/2012 8:40 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:31:07 -0800, Delvin ýt wrote:

On 2/7/2012 4:48 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:42:46 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:07:28 -0600, Ignoramus8327
wrote:

Show me one Republican who is concerned with the very poor...

Show me one Democrat who is concerned with the very poor...
They're all the same: uncaring, greedy buttheads.

Nonsense. That's the cynicism that comes from not having much actual
experience.

I'm surrounded by Democrats. They're more involved with the homeless
than anyone I know in the local Republican Party (where I still go to
occassional cocktail parties). My neighbor, for example, puts in time
in a soup kitchen every week. He ain't no Republican.

Nor are you.

You're a moron, Delvin.

You're not a Republican, eddie.

How would you know, moron?

By the well-left-of-center crap you right here, not-so-fast eddie. Your
sentiments are all left-wing - well to the left of center, even for the
left-leaning area in which you live.

I'm anti-bull****, Delvin.

Ha ha ha ha ha! No, you're just highly partisan in your choice of
palatable bull****, not-so-fast eddie.



If you ignore TMT and Hawke (which I mostly
do), almost all of it comes from the right. Like, for example, your
stupid propaganda about the birther issue. You still don't seem to
know what dicta is,

That would be you, not-so-fast eddie. You called the Happersett
discussion of citizenship dicta, then said it wasn't dicta and denied
having called it dicta. You're not only not a lawyer, not-so-fast
eddie, but you're not even a well-read layman regarding the law. What
you are, not-so-fast eddie, is a left-wing blowhard who for some bizarre
reason (shame? dunno) is afraid just say you're a leftist and *be* a
leftist.


and your novel idea about "basic citizenship" is a
pile of bull that you made up on the spot.

No, not-so-fast eddie, you're lying - again. You said the court
"explicitly said that it was not deciding the question of 'natural
born.'" It said no such thing. You quoted, then misinterpreted, the
court in Happersett:

"Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born
within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of
their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never
as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary
to solve these doubts."

"Those doubts", not-so-fast eddie, were *not* regarding natural born
citizenship - they were about simple, or basic, citizenship.

I invented nothing, you incompetent and unimaginative liar.


So I mostly contradict you rightards.

You are a leftard, not-so-fast eddie - and a dishonest one, but that
goes without saying.


Relative to you, I'm to theleft.

You are well to the left of the American center.


But so were Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.

No, not-so-fast eddie. Reagan was an avowed conservative. I'm
libertarian. Goldwater ran for president as a libertarian-inclined
conservative, and became more libertarian in the rest of his Senate career.

You are an in-denial leftist, not-so-fast eddie.