"HeyBub" wrote in message
news
REPUBLICANS HAVE MORE ORGASMS
"It's the G-OHHHHH-P!
"Republicans are more likely to have better sex than Democrats, according
to
a new, 5,000-subject survey released by Binghamton University and
Match.com
on Friday.
Yet more Republican flamebait from the master baiter.
This rather childish game can be played from either side:
Liberals Smarter Than Conservatives:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0224132655.htm
"Specifically, liberalism and atheism, and for men (but not women),
preference for sexual exclusivity correlate with higher intelligence, a new
study finds . . .In the current study, Kanazawa argues that humans are
evolutionarily designed to be conservative, caring mostly about their family
and friends, and being liberal, caring about an indefinite number of
genetically unrelated strangers they never meet or interact with, is
evolutionarily novel. So more intelligent children may be more likely to
grow up to be liberals . . . Young adults who identify themselves as "not at
all religious" have an average IQ of 103 during adolescence, while those who
identify themselves as "very religious" have an average IQ of 97 during
adolescence."
On the other hand, your survey, produced by world renowned social scientists
"Match.com" and reported in the scrupulously peer-reviewed NY Daily News (a
bastion of scientific social research in tabloid form for easy subway
reading) says:
"But while Republicans have bragging rights about better sex, they don't get
to enjoy it that often. Those surveyed said they have their fun less
frequently than their Democratic counterparts."
Uh oh, a fatal flaw . . .
Anybody knows that if you don't have sex for a long time, sexual tension
builds and orgasms "seem" more potent. But the apparent potency can simply
be accounted for by the long gaps between sexual activity. So one could
extrapolate and say "Republicans don't know much about sex or the human
body." That was evidenced during the extraordinary Terri Schiavo hearings
led by Congressional Republicans.
"CAT scans showed that almost 90% of her cerebrum the "largest and most
complex part of [the] brain [which is] involved in consciousness, thinking,
speech and emotions" had been replaced by spinal fluid. "
http://www.religioustolerance.org/schiavo6.htm
Yet, the Republicans ran counter to reams of medical evidence and tried to
"save her" (which they failed to do, despite all the hubbub).
So, if you don't have sex very often, you don't know when someone's a
vegetable beyond salvation, you don't care if billions of people you don't
know are killed in another World War or believe that it doesn't matter if
American soldiers you don't know are killed or horribly maimed because
you've convinced yourself "they knew the risks" and they "enjoy blowing
stuff up" then you might be a Republican. Or worse. (-:
As for this being "real science" it's based on self-report data. In order
to believe in the survey, you have to believe that neither Republicans or
Democrats lie, especially about sex. Mark Foley and the Capitol Pages comes
to mind when I consider that option. As does Clinton's "it was not sex"
whopper and Larry Craig's claim "I'm not gay" and on and on. I consider
this survey in terms of that old joke: "Ninety-five percent of American men
claim they masturbate - the other five percent are liars." While it's not
as ludicrous as that "report" that "liberals swear more often" (created by
one of the sloppiest and most meaningless Google searches ever put forth as
"science), it's still pretty vacuous. Unlike the Google BS, it at least has
the cloak of scientific basis.
It's probably not hard for a survey taker to figure out what the goal of the
survey was and to try to game it to make their side look better. In the
scheme of things, I'd rate the study from "high irrelevant" to "totally
meaningless political claptrap."
You at least get one silver star for marking it OT.
--
Bobby G.