On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:58:17 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:

In article ,
"Attila.Iskander" wrote:

NO dummy.
I'm an agnostic who:
1) has studied the subject extensively
2) has a low tolerance for stupidity
3) unlike you, is smart enough to know that playing the devil's advocate
does NOT automatically mean, that such a person is a "believer" of the
position he's arguing.


For reasons I don't entirely understand, it seems sorta strange for
an agnostic to be a devil's advocate (grin).

Advocating for the nonexistent? Sorta like telling the world that HarryK a
brainiac.