"Harry K" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 1:57 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Harry K" wrote in message

...





On Jan 18, 6:11 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Harry K" wrote in message

...

On Jan 17, 12:54 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Harry K" wrote in message

...

On Jan 17, 4:35 am, Bob_Villa wrote:
On Jan 16, 10:39 pm, Harry K wrote:

Done 50 years ago and discovered that there is nothing behind
the
curtain.

I'm sorry you are so embarrassed about your beliefs you can
'debate'
them but have to resort to insults.

Harry K

Actually, that is the point...you gave-up thinking 50 years ago
and
assume that thinking was correct. (you have to admit, it is a
stand...and you don't cross the line) You cut-off reason and
feeling
on the subject. I know because I was there!

It may be a "leap" of faith...but it is a kinder, gentler place
to
be.

Well, goody for you. I prefer to stick to science rather than
myths.

Maybe you need to do some reading
Try "The Science of God" by Gerald Schroeder
Then go on to some of his other works
At least, it might make you think- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When I do research I stick to actual science, not myths. If you
actually _did_ any thinking you wouild recognize the foundation of
quicksand the bibible is built on.

So you don't even know who Gerald Schroeder is, and summarily dismiss
what
he has to say...
Mmmm
Such a CLEAR demonstration of an open mind and intellectual curiosity.
Apparently you are so scared of a different point-of-view, that you
avoid
it
like the plague.
In other words, what you really mean is that you only stick to what
already
fits your preconceptions, prejudices and bigoted point-of-view

Got it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't have to read him to know by the title it will be a rehash of
all the NON scientific crap put out by the ICR, the DI and like
sources. I will read that when it shows up in the science section of
the library;.

There you go demonstrating that you
1) Don't know ****
2) Are a superficial twit
3) Are ignorant to boot

"Gerald Schroeder and his New Variation on the - Answers in Genesis"

That says it all.

As I said
You remind me of a paranoid claim in a field of starfish.
Too bad it reflects so poorly on any claim to intelligence you may have.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Odd that you can't rebut what I say, just insults. Why is that? Is
your 'googling finger' broken?


What did you say that was worth a rebuttal
Posibly I didn't hear you
Oh wait, I didn't "hear" you, you moron