"Harry K" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 5:54 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Harry K" wrote in message

...





On Jan 17, 5:50 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Betelgeuse" wrote in message

news

On 1/17/2012 7:32 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:

As for lack of evidence you just stumbled on one of the big proofs
that Ye Flood never happened. Had it happened there are facts and
evidence that would have to exist but don't.

We finally agree on something

I always love the logic of those that claim that evidence SHOULD exist
And that the absence of such evidence, is magically proof of something
else.

Absence of evidence is just that and nothing more
ABSENCE of EVIDENCE.
The ONLY thing it proves is that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.

Apparently this concept is far too complex for some of the dolts of
the
planet.

So the lack of any world wide layer of mud dated to only about 6,000
years ago is not evidence there was no Ye Floode?

Yes
1) What makes you imagine that it's 6000 years ago ??
2) What makes you imagine that over millennia of tectonic and glacial
activity such a layer would be preserved ?


So you are among the 10,000 YOA group? If not what is your date for
Ye Floode?


Wow
From 6000 to 10,000, talking about a planet that's been around for millions
??
You do have a limited horizon.
Must come with the small mind.



If the idiots come up with false premises, it follows that the idiots
conclusions are also false.

Unless of course the "idiots" find facts and evidence that show their
premises are true. Which is the case.


Too bad that still remains to be demonstrated


Denial does not make facts disappear


What facts are those ?
The ones that don't exist that lead you to conclusions based on facts
that don't exist..
Got it...




I'll stop here and leave you chasing your tail like a young pup.