View Single Post
  #284   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Attila.Iskander Attila.Iskander is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default "If Fred watched Science Channel Twice Per Day..."


"Harry K" wrote in message
...
On Jan 17, 5:50 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Betelgeuse" wrote in message

news
On 1/17/2012 7:32 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:


As for lack of evidence you just stumbled on one of the big proofs
that Ye Flood never happened. Had it happened there are facts and
evidence that would have to exist but don't.


We finally agree on something


I always love the logic of those that claim that evidence SHOULD exist
And that the absence of such evidence, is magically proof of something
else.

Absence of evidence is just that and nothing more
ABSENCE of EVIDENCE.
The ONLY thing it proves is that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.

Apparently this concept is far too complex for some of the dolts of the
planet.


So the lack of any world wide layer of mud dated to only about 6,000
years ago is not evidence there was no Ye Floode?


Yes
1) What makes you imagine that it's 6000 years ago ??
2) What makes you imagine that over millennia of tectonic and glacial
activity such a layer would be preserved ?

If the idiots come up with false premises, it follows that the idiots
conclusions are also false.



The presence of ice cores from the Arctic and Antarctic going back
over 100,000 years is positive evidence that Ye Floode never
happened. To point out the obviouse - ice floats, there shuld have
been no ice cores going back more than about 6,000 years.


You mean, it didn't happen in the last 100,000 years
OK, I'll buy it with THAT correction
Now then how old is the planet ??
100,000 years old ?
Or much older ??
Which means that again you are limited by your dataset.

False premise = false conclusion.


Then there is the biggee.

1. Where did all that water come from? Approximately 5 miles deep
would have been needed. Don't even try the old "canopy" crap. That
is impossible by the laws of physics on so many fronts. To start with
the earth would have been in total darkness prior to the flood. Don't
even try the "the mountains weren't as high. The amount and rate of
mountain building that would be needed afterward wouild have rndered
the entire earth uninhability for centuries.


We'll let's see.
Make the planet flatter without the deep trenches or the tall mountains.
Melt all the ice
Oops
All of a sudden it's quite possible to have a planet covered in water.
Not to mention all that Global Warming **** telling us that we'll soon drown
from all the ice melting..



2. Where did it go?

Why have none of the expeditions retruned with hard evidence that
tehre is an ark on that mountain? No, the wood that has been produced
was tested and found to be far too young. Alllthe rest of the
'evidence' you people put ofrth is nothing but stories. "we saw, I
found, etc" and oddly not even one picture even of the "we found"


Following 1), trigger some tectonic activity
Ocean trenches and mountains form.
Big fat honking valleys to keep the water from the high ground.
Just like these days..

You guys can now return to your usual kindergarten insults.


Maybe you should just go back to kindergarten and restart your education...
Put some emphasis on logical thinking and the dangers of makes stupid
assumptions when you reach the high school level.