"Tony Miklos" wrote in message
...
On 1/15/2012 10:16 AM, Attila.Iskander wrote:

"Tony Miklos" wrote in message
...
On 1/15/2012 9:41 AM, Attila.Iskander wrote:

"Tony Miklos" wrote in message
...
On 1/14/2012 5:26 AM, Bob_Villa wrote:
On Jan 13, 10:34 pm, Harry wrote:
On Jan 13, 10:43 am, wrote:









On Jan 13, 10:35 am, Tony wrote:

On 1/13/2012 10:53 AM, Bob_Villa wrote:

On Jan 13, 8:27 am, Tony wrote:

Hey! The bible was written by the same people who said the earth
was
flat. It's got to be true!

You're showing your ignorance. Genesis/Creation refers to the
"Great
Dome" of the Earth (its atmosphere).

Now you are showing your ignorance. A dome is not the same as a
sphere
A dome would refer to the atmosphere of a flat Earth. The bottom
of a
dome would be flat.

Your interpretation...hope you don't choke on it!

He won't because he is correct.

"Dome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dome

A dome is a structural element of architecture that resembles the
hollow upper half of a sphere..."

Harry K

Your explanation didn't say anything about the flat base though...did
it?

The flat part would be the flat earth as they then thought. How would
a dome cover a spherical earth?

Well it would cover the visible portion ANYWHERE on a round planet.
Are you suggesting that people in south of the Equator do NOT see the
heavens as a dome ?

You got in the discussion too late. It's not me who thinks the earth
is flat, and if you used a dome shape atmosphere as was earlier
mentioned, only half of the earth could support life. That comes from
the bible thumpers not me.


Keep trying
If you repeat yourself long enough, you'll even manage to convince
yourself that your smart.


LOL, you are already at that point.


This from someone who admits making assumptions in the same sentence that he
claims going by what is written
The applicable descriptive would be "delusional".